1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,213
The compact fluorescent lamp is, essentially,&nbsp;&nbsp;

2
00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:04,704
no more.

3
00:00:04,704 --> 00:00:06,147
We’ve moved on.

4
00:00:06,147 --> 00:00:08,650
In our search for&nbsp; more efficient sources of lighting,

5
00:00:08,650 --> 00:00:11,727
we’ve gone full-steam-ahead towards the glowing computer&nbsp;chips

6
00:00:11,727 --> 00:00:13,522
we call LEDs.

7
00:00:13,522 --> 00:00:16,213
I’m borrowing "glowing computer chips," by the way,

8
00:00:16,213 --> 00:00:18,751
from a vehemently&nbsp;anti-LED commenter

9
00:00:18,751 --> 00:00:21,473
who thought that was some sort of a derogatory quip,

10
00:00:21,473 --> 00:00:23,257
but honestly I think it’s&nbsp;awesome!

11
00:00:23,257 --> 00:00:24,650
Glowing computer chips?

12
00:00:24,650 --> 00:00:25,627
Yes, please!

13
00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:28,102
Now, I’m not about to go and make a video about

14
00:00:28,102 --> 00:00:31,689
“The&nbsp;Slightly Antique Light Bulb that’s Better than Yours”

15
00:00:31,689 --> 00:00:35,024
because today we are in an objectively&nbsp;
better place.

16
00:00:35,024 --> 00:00:38,889
I wouldn’t for a moment suggest that the CFL was a superior light source

17
00:00:38,889 --> 00:00:42,292
to honestly any LED bulb you can find today.

18
00:00:43,280 --> 00:00:46,507
Well, OK, perhaps better than the very dubiously-made

19
00:00:46,507 --> 00:00:49,555
LED bulbs that folks like Big Clive find on eBay,

20
00:00:49,555 --> 00:00:51,680
at least from shock hazards and

21
00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:54,171
prone-to-burning-your-house-down perspectives.

22
00:00:54,171 --> 00:00:59,618
But while these were flawed, problematic, and aesthetically…

23
00:00:59,618 --> 00:01:03,773
suboptimal, in hindsight I think they got an unfairly bad&nbsp;rap.

24
00:01:03,773 --> 00:01:06,240
And in this video, I’d like to explain why.

25
00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:10,880
Let’s begin with why these were&nbsp;
a big deal technologically.&nbsp;&nbsp;

26
00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:13,830
The reason fluorescent lighting was a thing&nbsp;
in the first place

27
00:01:13,830 --> 00:01:18,371
is that the technology produces much more light per unit of electrical&nbsp;energy

28
00:01:18,371 --> 00:01:20,907
than is possible with incandescent bulbs.

29
00:01:20,907 --> 00:01:25,424
Fluorescent tubes also had a much longer life than&nbsp;
the typical incandescent lamp.

30
00:01:25,424 --> 00:01:29,098
The efficiency and long life made fluorescent lights more economical,

31
00:01:29,098 --> 00:01:32,122
so in applications like office buildings, store locations,

32
00:01:32,122 --> 00:01:36,185
and other places where a lot of light&nbsp;
was needed for a long period of time,

33
00:01:36,185 --> 00:01:38,624
fluorescent lighting made perfect sense.

34
00:01:38,624 --> 00:01:42,295
But for many&nbsp;years, the form factor was…

35
00:01:42,295 --> 00:01:43,760
rather commercial.

36
00:01:44,720 --> 00:01:46,960
Long fluorescent tubes like these

37
00:01:46,960 --> 00:01:49,335
were the&nbsp;de facto standard for many decades.

38
00:01:49,335 --> 00:01:55,143
Sometimes we’d get a little clever and bend them into a&nbsp;
U-shape or maybe even a circle,

39
00:01:55,143 --> 00:01:56,417
but that was it.

40
00:01:56,417 --> 00:02:00,470
Now, these tubes are filled with a low pressure mixture&nbsp;
of various gases

41
00:02:00,470 --> 00:02:02,484
and a tiny bit of mercury.

42
00:02:02,484 --> 00:02:05,314
When an arc discharge is produced along their length,

43
00:02:05,314 --> 00:02:08,528
the&nbsp;mercury vapor emits a lot of ultraviolet light.

44
00:02:08,528 --> 00:02:11,942
A mixture of phosphors that coat the inside surface&nbsp;
of the glass

45
00:02:11,942 --> 00:02:16,648
then convert this largely invisible UV discharge into visible light that we can see,

46
00:02:16,648 --> 00:02:20,088
making&nbsp;the mercury discharge useful for our eyes.

47
00:02:20,088 --> 00:02:25,333
Additionally, the glass itself blocks&nbsp;nearly all of the harmful UV wavelengths.

48
00:02:25,333 --> 00:02:29,914
It takes special quartz glass to produce&nbsp;
UV-C germicidal lamps.

49
00:02:29,914 --> 00:02:35,233
Nevertheless many people wrongly assumed that ordinary&nbsp;
fluorescent lighting produced harmful UV.

50
00:02:35,760 --> 00:02:39,711
It didn’t, at least not in any remotely meaningful&nbsp;
amounts.

51
00:02:39,711 --> 00:02:42,995
This is a bit of a tangent, but the clearest evidence of this

52
00:02:42,995 --> 00:02:48,695
is that the plastic lenses of fluorescent ceiling fixtures generally didn’t yellow with time,

53
00:02:48,695 --> 00:02:54,274
which you’d expect them to and rather quickly if the tubes were producing&nbsp;ultraviolet light.

54
00:02:54,274 --> 00:02:57,042
UV is not kind to plastics.

55
00:02:57,600 --> 00:03:02,217
Anyway, you also need a ballast&nbsp;and starter circuit to drive these tubes.&nbsp;&nbsp;

56
00:03:02,640 --> 00:03:05,256
First, an arc discharge has to be established -

57
00:03:05,256 --> 00:03:09,593
after all, this is a long tube and getting electricity through plasma

58
00:03:09,593 --> 00:03:13,039
from this end&nbsp;to that end takes a bit of effort.

59
00:03:13,039 --> 00:03:16,001
There are many different ways to do this which aren’t&nbsp;
important right now,

60
00:03:16,001 --> 00:03:18,673
but once it’s struck you have a new problem.

61
00:03:18,673 --> 00:03:24,103
Being a discharge lamp, you need a&nbsp;
current-limiting device or else it will explode.

62
00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:29,840
OK, well maybe not explode, but discharge lamps&nbsp;
have negative electrical resistance

63
00:03:29,840 --> 00:03:34,833
and without a current limiting ballast they would rapidly enter a&nbsp;
sort of runaway condition

64
00:03:34,833 --> 00:03:36,667
and cause problems.

65
00:03:37,280 --> 00:03:41,743
So, with any given fluorescent fixture, you’ll&nbsp;
have a ballast and starter of some sort

66
00:03:41,743 --> 00:03:44,220
driving some number of large tubes.

67
00:03:44,220 --> 00:03:47,635
As a result,&nbsp;fluorescent fixtures tended to be…

68
00:03:47,635 --> 00:03:48,383
large.

69
00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:52,069
This is a basic shop light and as you can see&nbsp;it’s lar-

70
00:03:52,069 --> 00:03:52,856
long.

71
00:03:52,856 --> 00:03:54,781
Four feet to be precise.

72
00:03:54,781 --> 00:03:59,384
Shorter tubes were available, and eventually you also had&nbsp;
fun things like the circline tubes

73
00:03:59,384 --> 00:04:05,015
but in general fluorescent lighting was limited to overhead&nbsp;
applications where space wasn’t at a premium.

74
00:04:05,015 --> 00:04:06,694
So… shop lights.

75
00:04:06,694 --> 00:04:07,628
Troffer lights.

76
00:04:07,628 --> 00:04:09,137
Surface-mounted&nbsp;light strips.

77
00:04:09,137 --> 00:04:10,224
Et cetera.

78
00:04:10,224 --> 00:04:13,981
Applications that, for the most part, weren’t found in the home.

79
00:04:13,981 --> 00:04:17,337
And&nbsp;if they were, it wasn’t usually in a formal space.

80
00:04:17,840 --> 00:04:21,365
But wouldn’t it be great if we could have&nbsp;
the benefits of fluorescent light -

81
00:04:21,365 --> 00:04:23,936
that being longer life and lower energy use -

82
00:04:23,936 --> 00:04:25,510
in more&nbsp;places?

83
00:04:25,510 --> 00:04:26,930
Heck yes it would.

84
00:04:26,930 --> 00:04:29,162
But how to do that?

85
00:04:29,162 --> 00:04:33,607
Well, you could build this thing which I made a&nbsp;
video on quite a while ago,

86
00:04:33,607 --> 00:04:37,316
but that’s definitely not the most practical way to go about it.

87
00:04:37,316 --> 00:04:42,220
What we really&nbsp;needed was some sort of self-contained fluorescent lamp

88
00:04:42,220 --> 00:04:46,672
with an integrated ballast that is about&nbsp;the same size as an incandescent bulb,

89
00:04:46,672 --> 00:04:48,884
and with hopefully the same brightness.

90
00:04:48,884 --> 00:04:51,511
And so, these things were born.

91
00:04:51,920 --> 00:04:56,108
This now iconic curly-q design was&nbsp;
the final landing spot

92
00:04:56,108 --> 00:04:58,348
after a bunch of different experiments.

93
00:04:58,348 --> 00:05:02,774
See, the&nbsp;ultimate limitation to how much light you can get out of a fluorescent tube

94
00:05:02,774 --> 00:05:04,856
is&nbsp;its surface area.

95
00:05:04,856 --> 00:05:07,036
With these long fellas

96
00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:09,065
that isn’t much of an issue,

97
00:05:09,065 --> 00:05:12,374
but if you want to&nbsp;get the same amount of light as an incandescent bulb

98
00:05:12,374 --> 00:05:15,604
in the same amount of space using a&nbsp;fluorescent tube,

99
00:05:15,604 --> 00:05:17,591
it takes some twisted thinking.

100
00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:21,920
This 60 watt equivalent lamp has a tube which&nbsp;
begins here,

101
00:05:21,920 --> 00:05:23,768
travels in a helix to the top,

102
00:05:23,768 --> 00:05:26,800
then doubles back down the&nbsp;other side where it ends here.

103
00:05:27,520 --> 00:05:33,280
That allows it to occupy a volume smaller than&nbsp;
a cube 2 inches or 5 centimeters on each side&nbsp;&nbsp;

104
00:05:33,280 --> 00:05:37,840
while the tube itself is roughly 14&nbsp;
inches or 35 centimeters in length.&nbsp;&nbsp;

105
00:05:38,400 --> 00:05:42,578
This alone is a huge achievement in manufacturing&nbsp;
and design.

106
00:05:42,578 --> 00:05:44,824
This is glass, mind you.

107
00:05:44,824 --> 00:05:50,007
We needed a way to mass-produce hollow glass tubes formed&nbsp;
into this intricate shape,

108
00:05:50,007 --> 00:05:51,176
and we did it!

109
00:05:51,280 --> 00:05:53,668
But that wasn’t the only innovation, here.

110
00:05:53,668 --> 00:05:58,816
The&nbsp;tube is driven at a higher intensity than an ordinary tube like this one.

111
00:05:58,816 --> 00:06:02,564
That allows its phosphors&nbsp;to glow more much brightly.

112
00:06:02,564 --> 00:06:06,536
There seems to be an inverse relationship between the diameter&nbsp;of the glass

113
00:06:06,536 --> 00:06:08,913
and how intense the discharge is.

114
00:06:08,913 --> 00:06:12,230
You see this as we moved from the old T12 tubes&nbsp;down to

115
00:06:12,230 --> 00:06:14,913
T8 tubes and eventually T5 tubes.

116
00:06:15,280 --> 00:06:19,440
I’m not exactly sure why that is, hopefully&nbsp;
one of you will let us know down below.&nbsp;&nbsp;

117
00:06:19,440 --> 00:06:22,237
But there’s also one more trick up&nbsp;its sleeve.

118
00:06:22,237 --> 00:06:24,187
Its electronic ballast.

119
00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:28,800
Fluorescent lamps operate on the same&nbsp;
AC power that everything else does.&nbsp;&nbsp;

120
00:06:28,800 --> 00:06:33,680
Because the voltage crosses the zero&nbsp;
point 100 or 120 times per second,&nbsp;&nbsp;

121
00:06:33,680 --> 00:06:39,220
lamps run on traditional magnetic ballasts are&nbsp;
actually pulsing at that frequency.

122
00:06:39,220 --> 00:06:42,389
This periodic dark time limits their output,

123
00:06:42,389 --> 00:06:48,489
but electronic&nbsp;ballasts get around this by first converting the incoming AC power to DC

124
00:06:48,489 --> 00:06:52,160
and then driving&nbsp;the actual tube at very high frequency AC.

125
00:06:52,960 --> 00:06:58,400
The frequency is so high that the phosphors&nbsp;
don’t have time to decay between pulses,&nbsp;&nbsp;

126
00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:02,974
and the effect is the lamp is constantly lit&nbsp;and does not pulse.

127
00:07:02,974 --> 00:07:05,331
This not only boosts it output further,

128
00:07:05,331 --> 00:07:09,724
but also eliminated the potential&nbsp;for eyestrain issues that old-style fluorescent lights

129
00:07:09,724 --> 00:07:11,869
could cause in some individuals.

130
00:07:11,869 --> 00:07:14,320
I actually&nbsp;made a video about that quite a while ago now.

131
00:07:14,960 --> 00:07:17,503
So. These were pretty neat little things.

132
00:07:17,503 --> 00:07:20,587
I keep&nbsp;using the past tense but you can still buy them,

133
00:07:20,587 --> 00:07:23,560
they’re just very much out of fashion&nbsp;
at this point.

134
00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:24,960
But they were a big deal.

135
00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:28,882
Bringing the advantages of fluorescent&nbsp;
light to more places was,

136
00:07:28,882 --> 00:07:31,662
I would argue, a great thing.

137
00:07:31,662 --> 00:07:35,156
However, they weren’t received&nbsp;with unanimous praise.

138
00:07:35,156 --> 00:07:38,468
And deservedly so, we’ll discuss that shortly.

139
00:07:38,468 --> 00:07:42,000
At the same time,&nbsp;though, a lot of the hatred for these things just…

140
00:07:42,560 --> 00:07:44,126
didn’t make sense.

141
00:07:44,126 --> 00:07:46,298
At least, not holistically.

142
00:07:46,298 --> 00:07:48,370
The biggest problem with these things?

143
00:07:48,370 --> 00:07:49,830
They’re nuanced.

144
00:07:49,830 --> 00:07:53,398
And we know how easily the&nbsp;
general public engages with nuance.

145
00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:58,240
See, I have a pet theory that a large&nbsp;
percentage of the aversion to CFLs&nbsp;&nbsp;

146
00:07:58,240 --> 00:08:04,240
came from people who really just… didn’t&nbsp;
know that much about lighting in general.&nbsp;&nbsp;

147
00:08:04,880 --> 00:08:08,769
I would argue that the CFL was really the first&nbsp;
mainstream way

148
00:08:08,769 --> 00:08:12,934
to get non-incandescent color temperatures in the home.

149
00:08:12,934 --> 00:08:16,699
Sure, fluorescent tubes&nbsp;weren’t unheard of in the domestic environment.

150
00:08:16,699 --> 00:08:19,581
They found their place in garages and shop&nbsp;
spaces,

151
00:08:19,581 --> 00:08:25,189
sometimes kitchens had them and linear over-the-mirror sort of deals in bathrooms&nbsp;were kinda common.

152
00:08:25,189 --> 00:08:32,688
But prior to the CFL, those sorts of odd applications defined what&nbsp;“fluorescent” light was.

153
00:08:32,688 --> 00:08:38,720
Fluorescent light was that cooler, gray-blue light you saw at the&nbsp;
office or in the store or maybe the basement.

154
00:08:39,360 --> 00:08:41,376
And see, here’s where my theory comes in,

155
00:08:41,376 --> 00:08:44,080
if&nbsp;that was how you imagined fluorescent light,

156
00:08:44,640 --> 00:08:47,178
maybe you weren't even aware of the CFLs

157
00:08:47,178 --> 00:08:52,430
like this that mimicked the light from an incandescent bulb fairly well.

158
00:08:52,430 --> 00:08:56,496
Yes, I&nbsp;know there is and can even see the difference,

159
00:08:56,496 --> 00:08:59,735
but I would put money on there being lots of&nbsp;
folks out there

160
00:08:59,735 --> 00:09:02,321
who wouldn’t know this was a fluorescent light source

161
00:09:02,321 --> 00:09:04,868
unless they could see&nbsp;the bulb itself.

162
00:09:04,868 --> 00:09:06,729
Their imagination is that

163
00:09:06,729 --> 00:09:13,360
*this* is fluorescent, and when the very idea of color&nbsp;
temperature is a new concept to a lot of people,

164
00:09:13,920 --> 00:09:17,218
I’d bet there was a lot of confusion that led to&nbsp;
undeserved

165
00:09:17,218 --> 00:09:20,694
and sometimes misplaced hatred of these little fellas.

166
00:09:20,694 --> 00:09:25,486
No matter how hard store displays&nbsp;
worked to show how warm the light actually could be.

167
00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:29,884
Again, this isn’t meant to be a love letter&nbsp;to the CFL.

168
00:09:29,884 --> 00:09:32,891
They were bad in a fair number of ways.

169
00:09:32,891 --> 00:09:38,341
But even I, a really picky person when it&nbsp;
comes to quality of light and color temperature,

170
00:09:38,720 --> 00:09:41,448
don’t have a problem with most CFLs.

171
00:09:41,448 --> 00:09:44,053
Some were&nbsp;better than others, yeah, but at their peak

172
00:09:44,053 --> 00:09:47,644
a nice 2700K CFL in a table lamp like this?

173
00:09:47,644 --> 00:09:48,987
No problem.

174
00:09:48,987 --> 00:09:54,391
About&nbsp;the worst thing I ever notice is a slightly pink, occasionally green cast to the light,

175
00:09:54,391 --> 00:09:58,433
but&nbsp;it’s really only noticeable when you have another light to compare it to -

176
00:09:58,433 --> 00:10:00,800
if an&nbsp;entire room is lit with the same CFLs,

177
00:10:01,440 --> 00:10:05,360
my eyes would acclimate to it and I just&nbsp;
couldn’t see that color cast anymore.

178
00:10:06,080 --> 00:10:08,920
Of course, color rendering index isn’t fantastic.

179
00:10:08,920 --> 00:10:12,878
It’s really expensive to develop near-perfect phosphor formulations

180
00:10:12,878 --> 00:10:16,499
so nearly all lamps were&nbsp;good but not great.

181
00:10:16,499 --> 00:10:19,888
But I don’t think I’ve ever run across a warm white CFL

182
00:10:19,888 --> 00:10:24,292
that messed with&nbsp;colors to the point that I could notice without being hypercritical.

183
00:10:24,292 --> 00:10:30,120
I still have some CFLs kicking&nbsp;around without any intention to replace them until they fail.

184
00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:33,030
In many applications&nbsp;their limitations just don’t matter

185
00:10:33,030 --> 00:10:35,920
so I’m not about to bother upgrading them needlessly.

186
00:10:36,640 --> 00:10:39,627
But, and this was in my opinion their&nbsp;
Achilles heel,

187
00:10:39,627 --> 00:10:43,947
the suitableness of CFLs was very situational.

188
00:10:43,947 --> 00:10:48,155
They wanted to be and&nbsp;were sold as general purpose light bulbs

189
00:10:48,155 --> 00:10:51,268
but couldn’t actually be used as such.

190
00:10:51,268 --> 00:10:54,902
Some&nbsp;fixtures were absolutely unfit for CFLs,

191
00:10:54,902 --> 00:10:58,235
despite the fact that CFLs could fit inside them.

192
00:10:58,235 --> 00:11:01,398
Similarly, some uses for them were impractical,

193
00:11:01,398 --> 00:11:03,603
and others would shorten their life&nbsp;considerably

194
00:11:03,603 --> 00:11:06,682
leading many folks to believe that they didn’t last as long

195
00:11:06,682 --> 00:11:10,311
as the&nbsp;incandescent lights they were supposed to outlive tenfold.

196
00:11:10,311 --> 00:11:12,660
And yeah, often they didn’t!

197
00:11:12,660 --> 00:11:16,482
But&nbsp;in most cases that wasn’t really their fault.

198
00:11:16,880 --> 00:11:19,331
Let’s start with those untimely deaths.

199
00:11:19,331 --> 00:11:22,930
Here’s a&nbsp;fixture that seems perfectly appropriate for CFLs.

200
00:11:22,930 --> 00:11:25,833
Plenty of clearance for the lamps, not a problem.

201
00:11:25,833 --> 00:11:28,142
Except yes a problem!

202
00:11:28,142 --> 00:11:30,519
This fixture is enclosed.

203
00:11:30,519 --> 00:11:35,440
CFLs didn’t get anywhere near as hot as&nbsp;
the incandescent bulbs they replaced,

204
00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:37,344
but they still got hot.

205
00:11:37,344 --> 00:11:39,598
Trap one of ‘em, or worse&nbsp;multiple,

206
00:11:39,598 --> 00:11:42,880
inside a glass bowl with no airflow at all

207
00:11:42,880 --> 00:11:45,741
and you’ve made a torture chamber for them.

208
00:11:45,741 --> 00:11:50,532
The&nbsp;electronic components in their integrated ballasts are only rated to a certain temperature,

209
00:11:50,532 --> 00:11:53,360
which&nbsp;can easily be exceeded in fixtures like these.

210
00:11:54,000 --> 00:11:58,544
And so, premature lamp failure was almost a&nbsp;
given in enclosed fixtures,

211
00:11:58,544 --> 00:12:04,800
and to be fair the packaging for these usually warned you that&nbsp;
they weren’t suitable in enclosed fixtures&nbsp;&nbsp;

212
00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:06,881
(but who reads the packaging?).

213
00:12:06,881 --> 00:12:10,279
This is actually&nbsp;still something of a problem with LED bulbs,

214
00:12:10,279 --> 00:12:16,175
but many of them on the market today have&nbsp;
electronics and temp sensors designed to limit their output and prevent overheating

215
00:12:16,175 --> 00:12:17,760
which allows them to be used without worry.

216
00:12:18,480 --> 00:12:22,160
But even simple orientation&nbsp;
could be a problem with CFLs.&nbsp;&nbsp;

217
00:12:22,160 --> 00:12:26,983
If a fixture had its socket at the top and thus the
bulb was hanging,

218
00:12:26,983 --> 00:12:31,317
a CFL would find itself with its ballast above the tube.

219
00:12:31,317 --> 00:12:35,120
The tube is the&nbsp;part that gets hottest, 
and since warm air rises,

220
00:12:35,680 --> 00:12:38,384
well the ballast gets pretty hot.

221
00:12:38,384 --> 00:12:43,341
This wasn’t&nbsp;always a problem - there could be enough airflow depending on the fixture's design.

222
00:12:43,341 --> 00:12:45,571
But&nbsp;often enough it was.

223
00:12:45,571 --> 00:12:47,436
More premature failures.

224
00:12:47,840 --> 00:12:49,736
Another thing that would kill them quickly?

225
00:12:49,736 --> 00:12:51,805
Frequent short use.

226
00:12:51,805 --> 00:12:56,385
Now, this problem didn’t necessarily need to be a problem.

227
00:12:56,385 --> 00:12:59,398
But, because we&nbsp;humans are impatient fickle things,

228
00:12:59,398 --> 00:13:03,017
we didn’t like bulbs that behaved like this one.

229
00:13:03,017 --> 00:13:06,750
A delay between&nbsp;switch-on and light is certainly annoying,

230
00:13:06,750 --> 00:13:11,209
but this is much easier on the electrodes at&nbsp;
the ends of the tube.

231
00:13:11,209 --> 00:13:15,252
This programming allows thermionic emissions from the filaments at the ends

232
00:13:15,252 --> 00:13:16,749
to help strike the arc.

233
00:13:16,749 --> 00:13:18,463
It’s the easiest way to do that,

234
00:13:18,463 --> 00:13:21,122
and the most gentle on the electrodes.

235
00:13:21,122 --> 00:13:24,746
This&nbsp;particular bulb spent many years in a fixture on a timer

236
00:13:24,746 --> 00:13:28,740
and has undoubtedly racked up many&nbsp;
thousands of hours,

237
00:13:28,740 --> 00:13:30,193
yet it still functions.

238
00:13:30,640 --> 00:13:33,285
But to the average person this was just annoying

239
00:13:33,285 --> 00:13:35,760
so instant-start ballasts became the norm.

240
00:13:36,320 --> 00:13:40,877
These essentially just blast a high-voltage&nbsp;
charge right through the tube.

241
00:13:40,877 --> 00:13:43,597
And this does make for a delay-free start,

242
00:13:43,597 --> 00:13:46,988
but it comes at the expense of harming the electrodes.

243
00:13:46,988 --> 00:13:49,811
Each start wears them down a tiny bit,

244
00:13:49,811 --> 00:13:53,333
and while a long operating session may help&nbsp;
restore them,

245
00:13:53,333 --> 00:13:58,490
when used in places like a closet or bathroom where the light is only on&nbsp;for a few minutes at a time,

246
00:13:58,490 --> 00:14:01,384
that opportunity simply doesn't exist.

247
00:14:01,384 --> 00:14:04,544
The great irony here was that&nbsp;the instant start ballasts

248
00:14:04,544 --> 00:14:08,398
made them seem more practical for these short-use applications,

249
00:14:08,398 --> 00:14:11,280
but in actuality it made them much worse.

250
00:14:12,080 --> 00:14:15,760
The CFL was really best suited for general&nbsp;
living space illumination

251
00:14:15,760 --> 00:14:18,961
that would be left on for long periods of time.

252
00:14:18,961 --> 00:14:22,994
But of course, much of that&nbsp;came from ceiling light fixtures like these

253
00:14:22,994 --> 00:14:26,176
which would harm the bulbs but in a different way.

254
00:14:26,176 --> 00:14:29,189
Where they&nbsp;could really shine were in table and floor lamps,

255
00:14:29,189 --> 00:14:32,835
a lot of outdoor fixtures like&nbsp;
these carriage things would do OK also…

256
00:14:33,124 --> 00:14:38,240
Really, just any fixture where it wasn’t upside&nbsp;
down and had decent airflow would do alright.

257
00:14:38,960 --> 00:14:41,186
But what about recessed cans?

258
00:14:41,186 --> 00:14:43,985
Those are always&nbsp;hanging bulbs upside down.

259
00:14:43,985 --> 00:14:47,042
Well, this wasn’t the only style of CFL.

260
00:14:47,042 --> 00:14:52,774
In their heyday, we were brute-forcing&nbsp;
CFL tech into all sorts of weird and interesting places,

261
00:14:52,774 --> 00:14:55,435
like these imitation flood lamps

262
00:14:55,435 --> 00:14:58,542
(some&nbsp;were even made to look like actual PAR lamps)

263
00:14:58,542 --> 00:15:00,903
or, my particular favorite,

264
00:15:00,903 --> 00:15:04,417
these teeny&nbsp;tiny things that IKEA sold at one point

265
00:15:04,417 --> 00:15:08,590
(with an intermediate base to be just&nbsp;
that extra bit of annoying)

266
00:15:08,590 --> 00:15:12,491
Still, even in suitable applications where they wouldn’t&nbsp;
overheat and die,

267
00:15:12,491 --> 00:15:14,720
CFLs still had drawbacks.

268
00:15:15,360 --> 00:15:19,166
A big, unsolvable issue was that when you&nbsp;
first turned them on,

269
00:15:19,166 --> 00:15:22,036
they hadn’t yet gotten their Fulbright scholarship.

270
00:15:22,036 --> 00:15:24,753
Fluorescent&nbsp;lamps take time to warm up

271
00:15:24,753 --> 00:15:28,095
as not all the mercury is a vapor when they’re cold.

272
00:15:28,095 --> 00:15:31,781
For general&nbsp;purpose lamps like these at room temperatures,

273
00:15:32,320 --> 00:15:34,156
this wasn’t a huge deal.

274
00:15:34,156 --> 00:15:37,433
They’d be about&nbsp;half their normal brightness when cold,

275
00:15:37,433 --> 00:15:41,173
certainly not at their best but not unusable&nbsp;by any means either.

276
00:15:41,173 --> 00:15:45,334
And usually within just a minute or so, they’d be as bright as they’d get.

277
00:15:45,334 --> 00:15:50,274
But,&nbsp;for whatever reason, most of the specialty bulbs that came about over the years

278
00:15:50,274 --> 00:15:53,213
would&nbsp;start out with next-to-useless brightness.

279
00:15:53,760 --> 00:15:56,676
Just take a look at this little “flood” thing.

280
00:15:56,676 --> 00:15:59,925
This is&nbsp;at room temperature but hasn’t been started in a while.

281
00:15:59,925 --> 00:16:01,561
Turn it on

282
00:16:01,561 --> 00:16:03,534
and that’s barely anything.

283
00:16:03,534 --> 00:16:08,437
In&nbsp;fact you can see the pink tinge brought about by the bit of neon in there used as a starter gas.

284
00:16:08,437 --> 00:16:12,440
Sometimes this would be purple suggesting argon was the starter gas.

285
00:16:12,440 --> 00:16:17,302
Anyway, after a while&nbsp;it is nice and bright, but this is annoying.

286
00:16:17,302 --> 00:16:22,749
In my experience, nearly every non-standard CFL&nbsp;
behaved just like this

287
00:16:22,749 --> 00:16:25,911
be it flood. Globe. A19 mimics.

288
00:16:25,911 --> 00:16:27,697
These weird little things.

289
00:16:27,697 --> 00:16:31,377
Really anything that&nbsp;wasn’t the standard exposed curly q.

290
00:16:31,377 --> 00:16:36,557
I’m really curious about why cold starts seemed&nbsp;
to be much worse in these specialty bulbs,

291
00:16:36,557 --> 00:16:41,749
especially since these floods, for example, are&nbsp;
really just a standard lamp with a special shade.

292
00:16:42,160 --> 00:16:48,391
I have no idea why these should have darker starts&nbsp;
than these ordinary lamps yet they do.

293
00:16:48,391 --> 00:16:55,200
Only thing I can think of is that having the tube enclosed led to&nbsp;
higher operating temps thanks to a lack of airflow

294
00:16:55,200 --> 00:17:00,642
which required different vapor pressure characteristics&nbsp;
which ultimately meant weak, slow starts.

295
00:17:01,200 --> 00:17:06,077
And then, regardless of type, using CFLs&nbsp;
outdoors was…

296
00:17:06,077 --> 00:17:07,440
interesting.

297
00:17:07,440 --> 00:17:14,487
In cold temperatures, they’d be *very* dim at startup and could&nbsp;take several minutes to reach full brightness.

298
00:17:14,487 --> 00:17:17,020
For something like a porch light that’ll be&nbsp;
on all night,

299
00:17:17,020 --> 00:17:20,851
well that’s not too much of a problem but when it gets *really* cold,

300
00:17:20,851 --> 00:17:24,234
well they start to lose brightness.

301
00:17:24,234 --> 00:17:27,763
They can’t actually reach their operating temperature when it's that cold,

302
00:17:27,763 --> 00:17:32,692
and on cold&nbsp;enough days they may not even be able to start at all.

303
00:17:32,692 --> 00:17:34,239
Not ideal.

304
00:17:34,239 --> 00:17:38,455
And, as you can imagine,&nbsp;their proneness to death by overheating

305
00:17:38,455 --> 00:17:42,720
meant that in hot climates they’d be even&nbsp;
more at risk depending on the situation.

306
00:17:43,360 --> 00:17:46,130
Oh, and of course there’s the elephant in&nbsp;
the room.

307
00:17:46,130 --> 00:17:47,419
Mercury.

308
00:17:47,419 --> 00:17:49,517
It’s not great stuff!

309
00:17:49,517 --> 00:17:53,027
Now, in some senses this problem was overblown.

310
00:17:53,027 --> 00:17:57,090
The&nbsp;amount of mercury that’s actually in these is miniscule,

311
00:17:57,090 --> 00:18:00,380
and it’s not like if you broke one&nbsp;
you’d need to exit the room in a panic

312
00:18:00,380 --> 00:18:04,492
and call a HAZMAT team else you’ll wake up the next day&nbsp;
with an extra toe.

313
00:18:04,492 --> 00:18:08,142
Accidental breakage was not a four-alarm fire kind of event.

314
00:18:08,142 --> 00:18:12,840
But at scale,&nbsp;disposing of these in landfills is not good.

315
00:18:12,840 --> 00:18:16,810
They should be recycled, and unfortunately efforts to&nbsp;do this

316
00:18:16,810 --> 00:18:20,160
(particularly in the US it seems) were pretty sloppy.

317
00:18:20,880 --> 00:18:24,565
Some stores kept receptacles for you to return&nbsp;
dead bulbs,

318
00:18:24,565 --> 00:18:26,889
IKEA was particularly good at this,

319
00:18:26,889 --> 00:18:31,200
but plenty of places left you in the dark on how&nbsp;
to deal with a bulb that left you in the dark.

320
00:18:31,840 --> 00:18:35,244
You can never get 100% capture with anything,

321
00:18:35,244 --> 00:18:39,328
and while estimates for how many ended up being recycled are all over the place,

322
00:18:39,328 --> 00:18:42,140
in the best&nbsp;case it’s quite bleak.

323
00:18:42,140 --> 00:18:45,805
The majority of these were disposed of improperly.

324
00:18:45,805 --> 00:18:47,270
Yay.

325
00:18:47,270 --> 00:18:50,106
There are only&nbsp;two ways to fix that problem:

326
00:18:50,106 --> 00:18:53,536
make it easier or perhaps incentivize recycling them

327
00:18:53,536 --> 00:18:56,137
(shame&nbsp;on policymakers for not getting that together)

328
00:18:56,800 --> 00:18:59,380
or… eliminate them entirely.

329
00:18:59,380 --> 00:19:01,440
And luckily&nbsp;that’s pretty much where we’re at.

330
00:19:02,160 --> 00:19:07,101
LED bulbs are still e-waste, to be clear, but they don’t&nbsp;
have mercury in them

331
00:19:07,101 --> 00:19:08,926
and that’s a huge plus.

332
00:19:09,120 --> 00:19:14,225
In general, the LED bulb fixed all the problems&nbsp;that CFLs had

333
00:19:14,225 --> 00:19:17,465
(except maybe for RF interference problems)

334
00:19:17,861 --> 00:19:20,911
One particular thing that LEDs brought us that

335
00:19:20,911 --> 00:19:25,382
really just never got figured out with CFLs was dimming.

336
00:19:25,382 --> 00:19:31,846
Sure, dimmable CFLs did exist but in my experience they always sucked.

337
00:19:31,846 --> 00:19:33,939
I don't know what was so hard about that -

338
00:19:33,939 --> 00:19:38,241
at my old job we had TONS of ceiling fixtures in the lobby that had

339
00:19:38,241 --> 00:19:41,040
fixed&nbsp;ballasts and replaceable lamps like these,

340
00:19:41,600 --> 00:19:44,002
and they handled dimming just fine.

341
00:19:44,480 --> 00:19:49,200
I guess it was just too expensive to figure out&nbsp;
how to do that in lamp-integrated ballasts.

342
00:19:49,840 --> 00:19:52,528
Now, dimmable LEDs are everywhere,

343
00:19:52,528 --> 00:19:56,001
and they&nbsp;come in all sorts of great styles with various features.

344
00:19:56,001 --> 00:19:59,085
Some of them are even… smart.

345
00:19:59,085 --> 00:20:01,411
I think&nbsp;they know algebra.

346
00:20:01,411 --> 00:20:05,694
We’ve gotten good at designing LED lamps to dissipate the heat they generate&nbsp;well,

347
00:20:05,694 --> 00:20:08,997
and to keep themselves in check when that’s not possible.

348
00:20:08,997 --> 00:20:11,860
Color rendering these days&nbsp;
is generally much better,

349
00:20:11,860 --> 00:20:13,137
even in basic lamps,

350
00:20:13,137 --> 00:20:16,243
and can be truly excellent in premium products.

351
00:20:16,243 --> 00:20:19,200
We are definitely in a better place today.

352
00:20:19,200 --> 00:20:20,642
But, these things?

353
00:20:20,915 --> 00:20:22,543
They didn’t suck.

354
00:20:22,543 --> 00:20:23,857
They&nbsp;were important.

355
00:20:23,857 --> 00:20:28,064
Miniaturizing fluorescent lights into these tiny things was a feat&nbsp;of its own,

356
00:20:28,064 --> 00:20:29,760
and I appreciate it greatly.

357
00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:33,046
CFLs also finally spurred development

358
00:20:33,046 --> 00:20:36,181
of warm&nbsp;white phosphor formulations that weren’t terrible.

359
00:20:36,400 --> 00:20:39,582
I mean, this circline tube is just horrid!

360
00:20:39,582 --> 00:20:43,256
That&nbsp;is not a warm and pleasant glow, GE.

361
00:20:43,256 --> 00:20:44,686
It’s sickly.

362
00:20:45,040 --> 00:20:48,423
These were just… misunderstood.

363
00:20:48,423 --> 00:20:52,450
I bet many of&nbsp;you can think back to a few of these that just kept on truckin'

364
00:20:52,450 --> 00:20:55,572
in fact maybe you’re&nbsp;like me and still have some going strong.

365
00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:58,985
When they were used in an appropriate application,

366
00:20:58,985 --> 00:21:00,834
they really weren’t half bad.

367
00:21:00,834 --> 00:21:06,163
If anything is to blame for their reputation, I think it’s that&nbsp;
their abilities were oversold.

368
00:21:06,163 --> 00:21:09,869
A lot of them died too young simply because of how they were used,

369
00:21:09,869 --> 00:21:12,399
and it’s not their user’s fault!

370
00:21:12,399 --> 00:21:14,781
Manufacturers just want to sell you light bulbs,

371
00:21:14,781 --> 00:21:17,751
so they’re&nbsp;not likely to help you figure out those details.

372
00:21:18,080 --> 00:21:20,772
And again, and I know I’ve said this like a&nbsp;
million times,

373
00:21:20,772 --> 00:21:22,720
it’s not like I miss these.

374
00:21:23,360 --> 00:21:27,111
Even in the best of cases, they would still lose output as&nbsp;
they age

375
00:21:27,111 --> 00:21:29,068
which often lead to color shifting.

376
00:21:29,068 --> 00:21:32,659
They still take time to warm up, particularly when they're cold.

377
00:21:32,659 --> 00:21:36,532
Dimmability is&nbsp;still rare and awful when it is there.

378
00:21:36,532 --> 00:21:40,171
But I don’t look back on these with pure hatred.

379
00:21:40,171 --> 00:21:44,400
In fact,&nbsp;I’m quite fond of what they managed to accomplish.

380
00:21:44,995 --> 00:21:47,549
The end.

381
00:21:48,391 --> 00:21:50,971
♫ underappreciatedly smooth jazz ♫

382
00:21:51,937 --> 00:21:56,507
I wouldn’t for a moment suggest that&nbsp;
the CFL was a superior ligh…

383
00:21:56,507 --> 00:21:57,494
darnit!

384
00:21:57,494 --> 00:21:59,703
I missed a pause.

385
00:21:59,703 --> 00:22:01,506
Goin’ REAL great!

386
00:22:01,506 --> 00:22:04,966
...to produce UV-C germicidal lambs. Neverth -

387
00:22:05,840 --> 00:22:07,924
Lamps. Not lambs.

388
00:22:07,924 --> 00:22:10,362
Germicidal&nbsp;lambs?

389
00:22:10,362 --> 00:22:11,476
What are those?

390
00:22:11,476 --> 00:22:14,311
First, and arc discharge&nbsp;ha-
[tube hits table and clanks]

391
00:22:18,127 --> 00:22:20,901
Don’t mind me, just thinking about how I’m gonna&nbsp;
put this down.

392
00:22:20,901 --> 00:22:21,538
Anywa…

393
00:22:21,538 --> 00:22:25,159
Anyway, you al…. 
[mumbling] nah I don’t wanna be too dismissive of myself.

394
00:22:25,159 --> 00:22:29,851
First, an arc discharge has to be established 
[tube clanks on table again] after… dang&nbsp;
[laughter]

395
00:22:29,851 --> 00:22:31,760
how many times will I record this line?

396
00:22:32,640 --> 00:22:39,200
From this end to that end takes a bit of&nbsp;
effort. There are many… [grumbling under breath]

397
00:22:39,200 --> 00:22:42,400
There are many different ways to do&nbsp;
this which aren’t important right now,&nbsp;&nbsp;

398
00:22:42,400 --> 00:22:45,042
but I missed a word so I have to restart.

399
00:22:45,042 --> 00:22:48,178
Anyway, you also need a ballast and starter [lamp clanks]...

400
00:22:48,178 --> 00:22:49,557
Anyway, you also need -

401
00:22:49,557 --> 00:22:54,798
Anyway, you also need a ballast and starter circuit to drive [lamp clanks]...

402
00:22:54,798 --> 00:22:57,054
this is REALLY annoying.

403
00:22:57,054 --> 00:23:01,012
With these long fellas,&nbsp;that wasn’t much of an issue
 [tube clanks repeatedly] but if you want to get...

404
00:23:01,012 --> 00:23:03,846
Stop making so much noise!

405
00:23:05,630 --> 00:23:08,792
Did you enjoy this light content?

406
00:23:08,792 --> 00:23:11,197
I know I did.

407
00:23:11,197 --> 00:23:14,988
It got my mind swirling with all sorts of twisted ideas.

408
00:23:14,988 --> 00:23:17,678
OK that sounds bad.

409
00:23:17,678 --> 00:23:20,866
Yikes.

